Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?
Shop deviantART for the
holidays and save BIG!
Click here! :holly:
[x]

deviantART

:date:
 
©2009 ~MadamDove
:iconmadamdove:

Artist's Comments

WARNING- Long artist comment follows!
------------------------------------------------------------

I did this retouch mostly for my interview at a digital photography studio tomorrow. The majority of the portrait touch-ups in my portfolio are of myself, which is a little awkward trying to explain ("weellll... I maintain a modeling portfolio as well AND I think it's unfair to ask others to use me as a stock model for art when I don't make any myself...."), so I wanted to get another one in to show I could do it on other models. I chose a male model because, well, most photographers focus on women.

I chose this photo specifically because it was interesting. The model is very nicely posed, and it's decent quality. I also chose it because the colors were slightly off, as was contrast, and the model was fading into the backdrop.

I'm really proud of this one. I took a lot of care working on the little details- loose threads, specks of dust, etc, before going on to the curves and colors. I changed the saturation of the background, as well as gave the model some warmer tones. I decided that the backdrop looked too artificial, so added in some texture. I finished up by crisping the model with a monochrome layer mask, and putting in a gradient layer to make better use of the light.

Post digital processing is necessary tool to stay on top of both the photography and the modeling business. I'm not a fan of hiding natural beauty/flaws or making plastic skin, but I also firmly embrace the concept of a digital darkroom (and yes, I have worked in a film darkroom, and yes, I did love it also).

Anywho, would love to hear all and any critiques! I'm trying to keep practicing and learning new things, so expect more processing to pop up in the gallery!

-----------------------
Credit goes where credit's due:

Model: :iconagonybliss: [link]

BG Texture: :iconlunartex: [link]

Comments


love 2 2 joy 0 0 wow 1 1 mad 0 0 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconbittykate:
Wow! It looks much, much better. Incredible work.
:iconfacade-of-life:
Ah, to be perfectly honest with you, I think I prefer the 'before.'

--
In a world where you can be anyone, or anything - be yourself.
:iconmadamdove:
That's fair, but I'd like to know why, please!

--
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."
--Henry Thoreau
:iconmadamdove:
Thank you very much :-)

--
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."
--Henry Thoreau
:iconfacade-of-life:
I think the 'after' shot looks a little too overworked. The 'before' shot is lovely and I really don't think it needed the amount of post-work that you did. The contrast is far too high and you've lost a lot of the detail in the highlights and in the dark areas, in what had been a well balanced, well exposed image. The second shot just looks as though it's been photoshopped to look 'good', whereas the first image is just good.

In sum, I think you tried to 'fix' something that didn't need fixing.

--
In a world where you can be anyone, or anything - be yourself.
:iconsjm1010:
Good luck tomorrow Tara!

This is a very excellent piece, you should do very well with it in the portfolio! The before is plain and the after add definite character to the photo.

--
If your fingers stink don't shake my hand.
:iconmadamdove:
Understood. I guess that boils down to a difference of opinion. I passed over many stock images because they were commercial quality- the lighting was, in my mind, pretty much perfect, as were the saturation levels. I though this one needed a little more pop to do the model justice- and that is as both a photographer's and model's opinion.

I do agree that the processing is obvious- but I don't think it screams it out (I hate "plastic" skin). I chose to go over the background because it was flat- I thought a more vintagey feel with some wallpaper would bring character. I could have kept some of the highlights in, either by working more with masks or dodging, but I honestly didn't want to spend that much time on unpaid work that wasn't mine. The only thing that really bothers me in the after is that the increased contrast brought out the features on the hand- but, again, didn't feel the desire to get really nitpicky.

Sorry, really long reply! I do appreciate the feedback though.

--
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."
--Henry Thoreau
:iconmadamdove:
Thank you hon! I've just been getting a presentation of my portfolio put together tonight... I have to admit, I love working with powerpoint. This time it's very simple and streamlined, kind of a mock-up of a flash port.

I'm so glad that you picked up on the extra feel of character! That's definitely what I was going for :-D

--
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them."
--Henry Thoreau
:iconserenityfhotography:
I think both have their own appearance. Meaning they both have their own personal touch. The first photo is rustic it seems. The blacks are almost slated and the entire photo compliments eachother. THe second photo has a different feel or 'mood' it's softer with darker tones making the shirt accent a bit more and the hair.

THe first photo show vulnerability. Shows the perfection in inperfection. Yours is more of a clean interpretation of how you feel the photo should be. Every artist has their own personal opinion. Just as every viewer has their own tastes. Some prefer the 'natural' to the perfection. I prefer to take both in and relish what they both have to offer as art.

The purpose of this photo was met though. It shows your ability as a photo fix up artist. It shows what your are capable of while still retaining the focal point. I think that on it's own you've done a wonderful job at portraying what you abilities are.

--
Amanda

[link]

Details

March 22
136 KB
90.0 KB
900×731

Statistics

15
3 [who?]
178 (0 today)
7 (0 today)

Share

Link
Embed
Thumb

Site Map